Coming soon
Why Agent Workflows Need Investigation, Not Just Monitoring
Traces show events. APMs show spans. Neither explains whether the workflow was correct, allowed, efficient, safe, or worth changing.
Thoughts on agent workflow investigation, AI observability, and building the neutral layer that explains what matters.
Traces show events. APMs show spans. Neither explains whether the workflow was correct, allowed, efficient, safe, or worth changing.
When agents cite evidence they never retrieved, traditional observability says "run completed." We think that's not enough.
Harvey cares about correctness. Decagon cares about refund risk. Cursor cares about unsafe edits. One dashboard can't serve all three.